Ciminelli v. United States,
598 U.S. ---- ---
S.Ct. ----, S.Ct. No. 21-1170, 2023 WL
3356526 (May 11, 2023)
Defense
win: Writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, Justice Thomas held that the Second Circuit’s right-to-control theory cannot
form the basis for a conviction under the federal fraud statutes because the
right to valuable economic information needed to make discretionary economic
decisions is not a traditional property interest. The government conceded
that the right-to-control theory was invalid but sought to save the conviction on
remand under a fraudulent inducement theory: that Mr. Ciminelli had committed
property fraud by engaging in a fraudulent scheme (colluding with the insiders connected
to Andrew Cuomo’s administration to be a preferred bidder for contracts in a
one billion dollar infrastructure investment campaign) for the purposes of
obtaining money (the contract value). This fraudulent inducement theory is questionable
as it would make it a federal fraud to lie to obtain property even if there was
no deprivation/wronging/harming/loss/even intended loss.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.